Department of Refugee services obligations and responsibilities regarding Refugee right to family unity

Legal Right, Humanitarian Principle, and Key to Durable Solutions

The right to family unity is inherent. This right applies to all human beings, regardless of their status. Few human rights instruments, however, are explicit about how and where this right is to be effected in relation to families that have been separated across international borders.

For refugees and those who seek to protect them, the right to family unity implies a right to family reunification in a country of asylum, because refugees cannot safely return to their countries of origin in order to enjoy the right to family life there (Refugee Protection in International Law UNHCR’s Global Consultations on International Protection, pp. 555 – 603)

The integrity of the refugee family is both a legal right and a humanitarian principle; it is also an essential framework of protection and a key to the success of durable solutions for refugees that can restore to them something approximating a normal life.

Respect for the right to family unity requires not only that States refrain from action which would result in family separations, but also that they take measures to maintain the unity of the refugee family and reunite family members who have been separated, especially where the refugee family has no realistic possibilities for enjoying that right elsewhere. ( UNHCR, Summary Conclusions, Family Unity, above fn. 5, para. 5)

The separation of families when people flee persecution and conflict can have devastating

consequences to their wellbeing and ability to rebuild their lives. At the moment of flight, families are forced to leave without knowing if their families are safe. Once in safety, refugees are

often unaware of the whereabouts of their family. (See generally, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Refugee Family Reunification. UNHCR’s Response to the European Commission Green Paper on the Right to Family Reunification of Third Country Nationals Living in the European Union (Directive 2003/86/EC), February 2012, available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/4f55e1cf2.html, p. 3)

The Problem of Geographic Separation within Kenya

The Department of Refugee Services (DRS) plays a central role in ensuring refugees family unity. However, current practices during admission, status determination, and designation of residence leads to family separation. For instance, assigning residence to some family members in Nairobi while placing others in Kakuma or Kalobeyei undermines their right to family unity. The Department of Refugee Services should take proactive steps to ensure family unity is a key principle consideration when placing refugees in designated areas.

Protection of the right to refugee family environment requires that the states (department of refugee services) not only refrain from actions which could result in family separation or other arbitrary interference in the right to family life, but also take positive measures to maintain the family unit, including the reunion of separated family members.(CMW and CRC Committees, Joint General Comment on the general principles regarding the human rights of children in the context of international migration, above fn. 24, para. 27.)

Jurisprudence

In Marckx v. Belgium, it has ruled that “ensuring respect for family life is an obligation for the State to act in a manner calculated to allow these ties to develop normally” and “to allow those concerned to lead a normal family life.( Marckx v. Belgium, Application No. 6833/74, ECtHR, 13 June 1979, available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b7014.html, paras. 45 and 31.) this principle that the State may be required affirmatively to promote family life has been repeated in the case, Gül v. Switzerland.

Rayment and Others v Minister of Home Affairs and Others; Anderson and Others v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (CCT 176/22) [2023] ZACC 40 (4 December 2023) where the issues to the Right to dignity and family life was raised and determined.

LEGAL PATHWAYS TO REFUGEES INTEGRATED SETTLEMENTS: HOUSING, LAND AND PROPERTY RIGHTS.

Introduction

Housing, land and property are rights guaranteed under Article 13 and 21 of the convention on the status of Refugees 1951. Refugee in Kenya face barriers in leasing land and houses much alone own one. As results refugee often end up in substandard housing, residing in informal settlement with insecure rights which negatively affects their health, access to education and economic status.

The Shirika Plan: A Bold Vision for Integrated Settlements

 The government of Kenya’s’ bold, Socioeconomic Hubs for Integrated Refugee Inclusion in Kenya- Shirika Plan envisions in its core pillars, “transforming the refugee camps into integrated settlements supporting the socioeconomic inclusion of refugees and hosting communities in Garissa, Turkana, and urban areas.

The four Core pillars of the Shirika Plan are;

 (i) Ease the pressure on refugee-hosting communities in Garissa, Turkana, and urban areas by mobilizing additional financial, technical, and material support in the spirit of responsibility sharing;

 (ii) Facilitate the transition from refugee camps set up to integrated human settlements and robust economic hubs;

(iii) Enhance refugee and host community socio-economic inclusion for enhanced self-reliance and resilience;

(iv) Facilitate the transition of refugee basic service delivery from humanitarian-led approach to government systems.

I will delve into the second pillar, “transition from refugee camps set up to integrated human settlements.”

Legal Framework for Land Rights in Integrated Settlements especially the Community land.

Chapter 5 of the constitution Of Kenya, mandates that land be held, used and managed in an equitable, efficient, productive and sustainable manner.

 Land in Kenya is held in three tenure regimes public, community and private. (Article 63 COK)

Community land tenure, is the common land tenure held in Turkana and Garissa hence it will be the base of our discussion with regards to the Kenyan law response to the “Refugee Integrated settlement” vision.

 Community land is vested in communities identified based on ethnicity, culture or similar community of interest. The County government holds unregistered land in trust for the communities for which it is held.

 The Constitution expressly dictates who and/or what constitutes a community for the purposes of landholding. The Community Land Act, however regulates the designation of various land use rights on community land of interest, more specifically, Section 29(b) and (g), provides the use of the land as settlement areas; and any other purpose as may be determined by the community, county government or national government for the promotion of public interest respectively.

 It would be important to note that sometimes there is conflict between the government and communities, on what a particular piece of land has been set apart for by the government and what the locals believe their ancestors or their culture stipulates, which conflict is to be anticipated in this engagement.

With the passing of the Refugee Act, 2021, (Section 28 (4), which gives refugees the chance to be gainfully employed and take part in Kenya’s economic and social development, will result in a noticeable and welcome improvement to Kenya’s response to refugees by working toward a whole-of-government approach to unlocking the potential for refugees in the country to significantly boost Kenya’s economy, where renting and leasing property will contribute to the Shirika vision.

Key Considerations for Implementing Integrated Settlements.

In conclusion, the responses that the author foresees in the implementation of the bold “Refugee integrated settlement is;

First, community land must be used for the benefit of the community, in compliance with the law and the rules and regulations established by the community. However, community land may be used by the county government or the national government for the promotion of public interest. (CLA Section 29 (g))

The Constitution on matters of compulsory acquisition, (COK, Article 40, Land Act, CLA section 6) stipulates that occupant of a piece of land and registered owners are to be paid compensation when land is taken for public purposes. Compensation will be held by the county government and released to the community as soon as the property is registered.

Second, On leases, it good to note that a registered community, with the approval of the members of the said community, may cancel a leasehold if the lessee fails to comply with the requirements or adhere to any restrictions imposed by or under any law pertaining to the utilization of the land to which the right relates or the rules and regulations of the community. (CLA, Section 33)

Third, the adoption of the social Tenure Domain Model

Kituo Cha Sheria and NRCICLA have taken the mantle to educate the refugees and the host communities in Kakuma and Daadab on Housing, land and property rights by providing, information, counseling and legal assistance.

By Rachael Wahome - Legal-KCS-FMP

 

Corporate

Contact Info: Head Office - Nairobi

Location: Ole Odume Rd, Off Argwings Kodhek Rd.
Postal Add.: P.O. Box 7483-00300 Nairobi, Kenya.
Tel: 3874191, 3874220, 3876290,
Fax: 3876295
Mobile: +254 734 874 221, +254 727 773 991

Email: info(at)kituochasheria.or.ke
Website: www.kituochasheria.or.ke

Newsletter

Subscribe to receive inspiration, ideas, and news in your inbox.

Copyright © 2023 – Kituo Cha Sheria. All Rights Reserved. Website by: RENCE INTERACTIVE